Showing posts with label books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label books. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

2026 Hugo Awards

I've never previously voted in the Hugo Awards, but at the urging from my friend Olav at An Unofficial Hugo Book Club Blog, I decided to try this year.

Now, I read a lot of contemporary comic books and non-fiction, but not much contemporary fiction -- and I've never been an authority on science fiction. I like what I like, but I don't have an expert's view on the genre.

In preparing to vote, I read a lot of material I would have never otherwise sampled. My first surprise was to find a lot of what's nominated in the Hugo Awards isn't for science fiction works - there's an awful lot of fantasy literature - stories of elves, magic schools and what have you. I'm even less qualified to judge the fantasy genre.

The second surprise was how much of the material that is science fiction isn't concerned so much with plot as it is character - not, "here's a science fiction concept," as it is, "here's how the protagonist feels about living amidst science fiction."

I won't discuss all my picks, but for Best Novel I chose Death of the Author by Nnedi Okorafor, a Nigerian science fiction author. The book's about a Nigerian science fiction author (write what you know) whose life changes when new technology helps her get out of her wheelchair.

For Best Novella, I chose Automatic Noodle by Annalee Newitz, a story about robots who exploit bureaucratic loopholes so they can run their own noodle shop. It was charming.

For Best Novelette, I chose The Girl That My Mother Is Leaving Me For by Cameron Reed, which covers transgenderism, cloning and wallcrawling in a very tight package.

For Best Short Story, I chose Laser Eyes Ain't Everything by Effie Seiberg, about a super-hero union and a villain who has a legitimate complaint about accessibility.

For Best Series, I broke my rule on picking science fiction titles and chose The Chronicles of Osreth by Katherine Addison. I read her book The Goblin Emperor years ago and didn't realize she'd added several more books to the series - I like the series a lot, so I was very happy to discover there was more.

For Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form, I chose Andor, which was a very hard call - I'd really enjoyed Sinners (if it were horror awards, I'd have picked it) and Superman; I watched Mickey 17 before sending my vote and found it very strong too. Andor, though, had a 2nd season that excelled beyond what I already had considered to be a very strong first season; it's the best Star Wars of this century.

And, of course, I chose An Unofficial Hugo Book Club Blog for Best Fanzine.

This was fun - I don't know whether I'll vote in the Hugos again, but I've added a number of books to my reading list, so it was worth doing at least once.

Thursday, April 16, 2026

What Is Dead May Never Die: Speculative Fiction Authors and Their Afterlives

 

It’s said that when Czech author Franz Kafka was on his deathbed in 1924, he left instructions to his executor Max Brod to burn all of his unpublished writing. Brod ignored the author’s wishes and spent the next decade publishing Kafka’s works; even though some of Kafka’s works were incomplete, they were printed in their incomplete form (the Castle ended mid-sentence!). History has more-or-less exculpated Brod’s decision because thanks to him, Kafka’s name has endured and the works he preserved from destruction – including the Trial – have become much studied and adored.

Yet when authors in speculative fiction die, their unfinished works are not usually published in an incomplete format; it’s become far more common for another author in the field to assume control of the work and finesse it into a finished status. For those authors who had recurring protagonists, it’s also common to see their heroes carried on by other authors; L. Sprague de Camp and Lin Carter likely wrote more words about Conan than Robert E. Howard himself.

At last year’s WorldCon in Seattle, authors Brandon Sanderson and George R. R. Martin were asked at a panel that, as Martin wouldn’t “be around for much longer,” why not turn over his A Song of Fire and Ice series to Sanderson for completion? (The exchange was reported on Kotaku)

The question arose because Martin’s series, begun in 1996, last saw a new book published in 2011; although Martin has repeatedly promised the next book in the series the Winds of Winter will be completed (and has published excerpts to pacify his fans), this is by the far the longest gap between books in the series.


Why was Brandon Sanderson dragged into this humiliating question? After author Robert Jordan died in 2007 with his Wheel of Time series incomplete, Sanderson completed the Wheel of Time series, taking a co-author credit for the Gathering Storm (2009), Towers of Midnight (2010) and a Memory of Light (2013).

Yet it seems especially bizarre to ask Sanderson this question because Sanderson had made his thoughts known as far back as 2016 that, while he had great respect for George R. R. Martin, he not only was not interested in finishing a Song of Fire and Ice, he didn’t especially like the content: “I don't shy away from difficult material, but I prefer not to get explicit,” he wrote on Reddit. “Honestly, when I read it in George's work, I often just cringe. I don't think it fits in prose; I think it looks tacky.”

Sanderson has been singled out by many fans as the voice they want to continue a Song of Ice and Fire should Martin fail to complete it himself – not because his voice is similar to Martin’s, but simply because he’s a fellow author of speculative fiction who has finished another author’s works before. It’s the same thinking that’s seen the rise of books “written” by A.I.; it sees authors as interchangeable and undistinctive.

Truly, the culture surrounding speculative fiction has long coached fans to believe it’s both normal and expected that when one author dies, another author will continue their work.

Sometimes it’s simply been playful; Edgar Allan Poe left behind an incomplete work called the Light-House and many authors have attempted to complete it, offering their own attempt at writing in the “voice” of Poe. Some authors were personally requested to complete an incomplete work by the original author prior to their death; other authors took it on as simply a work-for-hire.

Christopher Tolkien and Guy Gavriel Kay completed the Silmarillion and published it in 1977, four years after the death of J. R. R. Tolkien. Christopher continued to edit and publish incomplete works of his father’s up until 2018 (Christopher died in 2020).

Douglas Adams’ Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series was continued by Eoin Colfer with 2009’s And Another Thing… Adams’ also left behind an incomplete Dirk Gently novel that was published in 2002 as the Salmon of Doubt, one year after Adams’ death.

Reviewing And Another Thing…, the Guardian wrote, “Distinctive writing rises from an individual mind and life, and so asking another author to take over is as logically nonsensical as, say, for the executors of George Best to find a boy on the streets of Belfast and ask him to extend the player's career.” Despite this caveat, the reviewer concluded: “I feel that Eoin Colfer has achieved a perfectly calculated adaptation: a novel which serves as a fitting memorial but also has a life of its own.”


Alfred Bester’s Psychoshop was completed by Roger Zelazny, which was published in 1998. Bester died in 1987 and Zelazny in 1995. Greg Bear joked that when he accepted the task of writing the book’s introduction he was the only science fiction author willing to risk his life by putting his name on the book. “The book is meant to make you grin,” Bear wrote, “but with a shake of your head; laughter with an edge. Bester laid down this tempo, but it was not at all difficult for Zelazny to pick it up and draw it out. Zelazny, after all, was one of Bester’s literary children; what Bester pioneered, Zelazny made his own country.”

Publishers Weekly wrote of Psychoshop, “There’s much fun to be had here, but the book doesn’t represent either writer in top form. Bester’s style in the first part of the novel seems date, and things don’t gel until Zelazny takes over halfway through the book.”

In his Year’s Best Science Fiction, Gardner R. Dozois wrote Psychoshop “is more of interest for nostalgic value than as a successful novel on its own terms, although flashes of the vivid prose styles of both authors do shine through here and there.”

Frederick Pohl completed Arthur C. Clarke’s the Last Thorem in 2008 (Clarke had turned over the novel for Pohl to finish prior to his death). Library Journal wrote that the Last Theorem “has been panned by critics and readers alike, and with good reason. It is uneven and occasionally dull, and it struggles to blend incompatible themes.”

Tessa B. Dick completed her ex-husband Philip K. Dick’s the Owl in Daylight in 2009 (long after his 1982 death) but Philip’s estate forced her to withdraw the novel from the marketplace.

Robert A. Heinlein’s Variable Star was completed by Spider Robinson in 2006, long after Heinlein’s 1988 death. Publishers Weekly judged, “Nostalgia for Heinlein’s early work may pique interest in this posthumous collaboration, but old Heinlein hands may be disappointed that the book is incomplete, being all journey and no arrival.”

Terry Bisson completed Walter M. Miller’s Saint Leibowitz and the Wild Horse Woman in 1997 after Walter died the previous year. Booklist wrote, “The able Terry Bisson has completed but can't compensate for Miller's desultory plot.”


Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson continued the Dune series long after Frank Herbert’s death in 1986. Frank Herbert wrote six Dune novels, but what’s that compared to the seventeen (and counting) Brian and Kevin have gifted us?

Kevin J. Anderson also completed L. Ron Hubbard’s Ai! Pedrito in 1998; he collaborated with Lydia van Vogt to complete A. E. van Vogt’s Slan Hunter in 2007; he wrote a Captain Nemo novel based on Jules Verne’s character. Indeed, Kevin J. Anderson may also be recognized for the many Star Wars novels he’s written but his magnum opus is surely the novelization to the film adaptation of Alan Moore and Kevin O’Neill’s League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. He also served as the coach for Microsoft’s beloved mascot Clippy the Paperclip (“It looks like you’re writing a prequel… would you like help with that?”). Truly, he has both borrowed and given in equal measure.

These are just a few of the many works in speculative fiction where an author’s demise has not prevented new works coming out under their names. The phenomenon exists outside of speculative fiction, of course; Tom Clancy, V. C. Andrews and Robert Ludlum’s names continue to appear on books they never wrote.

As the reviews I’ve cherry-picked demonstrate, the results of one author finishing another’s work seldom satisfies audiences. Indeed, many of these works have become forgotten since their publication. Bester fans are happy to have Psychoshop, but it’s in no danger of displacing the Demolished Man or the Stars My Destination in his bibliography.

As I say, it’s easy to see why fandom believes someone else should come along and finish a Song of Ice and Fire should Martin fail to do so himself. My earnest plea is: Maybe you should reconsider?

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

2025 in Media

A brief look back at the best films, comics and books I encountered in 2025.

Films of 2025: I made it out to the theatre for just 3 new films in 2025: Captain America: Brave New World, Mission: Impossible - Final Reckoning and Superman. I shared some thoughts about Superman here. For me, the latest Mission: Impossible was the best cinematic experience of the year, which would have surprised me years ago since I started out hating the franchise; I've really come around to it (it helps that the films have shown more respect for the TV series over time) and it's a great experience on a big screen. I also went to the theatre for a 100th anniversary re-release of the Phantom of the Opera which featured live organ music (especially composed for the event) and used an edit of the film assembled by the Calgary Cinematheque to more closely resemble the original theatrical release; it was a unique experience and the edit was the best version I've seen of the 1925 film. I also saw the 2025 films Sinners and Fantastic Four: First Steps at home; Sinners was a good time, I enjoyed its take on vampire mythos - though, frankly, the slaughter of the KKK at the climax of the film surpassed any of the previous action scenes.

Other films that I especially enjoyed were the horror film the Mist, the Holocaust drama Denial, the excellent retro action film Godzilla Minus One and the thriller the Falcon and the Snowman.

Comics of 2025: I continued following Stan Sakai's Usagi Yojimbo, which released the mini-series Ten Thousand Plums last year; I reviewed it here. I also reviewed the anthology comic Fantastic Four Fanfare. I'm still reading Larry Hama's G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero and I'm really enjoy Al Ewing's take on Thor, which is heavy on continuity and cosmic horror. I also read Al Ewing and Steve Lieber's Metamorpho, which was good fun. I'm also reading (and yet to finish) the mini-series Death of the Silver Surfer by Greg Pak and Sumit Kumar and Marvel Knights: The World to Come by Christopher Priest and Joe Quesada.

The only other comic book of note that I read in 2025 was Patton Oswalt, Jordan Blum and Scott Hepburn's Minor Threats, which I reviewed here.

Books of 2025: The only 2025 book I read was Future Boy by Michael J. Fox, his personal account of the making of the original Back to the Future film. The most interesting part of Fox's story were his personal memories of what it was like to be a struggling young actor - it was especially striking to hear about when he owned only three shirts.

I read an awful lot of other books in 2025 - the best works of fiction were the Magic Skin by Honore de Balzac, about a man whose life is mystically bound to a piece of leather; the Secret History by Donna Tartt, which I sought out because I saw it favorably compared to Columbo - I wouldn't make the comparison myself but it was an excellent thriller; I read the science fiction novel Existence by David K. Brin; Cornell Woolrich's Waltz into Darkness was an interesting piece about a man who falls in love with a criminal and tries to make their relationship work; The Three Impostors by Arthur Machen was an engaging mystery read; I read A. P. Herbert's the House by the River, which I'd seen in film form and enjoyed; finally, I started reading Stephen R. Lawhead's Pendragon Cycle, starting with Taliesin and Merlin.

Early on, I read Banned Books by Elizabeth Blakemore and sought out many of the titles listed there; many of them were books about Black people's existence. Those I enjoyed the most were Black Boy, Richard Wright's autobiography about how Communists are intolerable people to be around, even when you're a fellow Communist; Maya Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas; and Stamped: Racism, Antiracism and You by Jason Reynolds.

Having become interested in Dr. Seuss' early cartooning work in publications like Judge, I read Brian Jay Jones' biography of Seuss, Becoming Dr. Seuss. I read Tim Roby's Box Office Poison about movie flops. i read Gideon Defoe's An Atlas of Extinct Countries, which focused on the various reasons why certain nations ceased to exist. And I read about the conservatism of science fiction in Jordan S. Carroll's Speculative Whiteness.

I also read a few books about the present state of Christianity in the US, including The Kingdom, the Power and the Glory by Tim Alberta and The Exvangelicals by Sarah McCammon.

I also read a great book about Angola - Jess Auerbach's From Water to Wine, her perspective of what Angola's emerging middle class are like. Although she lived in a different part of Angola than where I lived, I appreciated and understood many of her insights.

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

Sacrificial Love

Recently my pastor David delivered a sermon where he reflected on what makes romance stories popular. One of the conclusions he drew was:
They're wonderful stories because they tell us something of the truth of love. Somebody is coming to help you; somebody is coming to hold you and to rescue you. Regardless of your past, they will love you. And that is a beautiful thing about these stories. But the problem of the modern romantic comedy is that something else seeps into it. And that's that the story of romance is that you are good and valuable as you are now. You are loved. And this is the depth and the breadth of which I'm willing to go to declare that to you, to state your value to you. But the modern romantic comedy sometimes has this message steep in that although you are good enough now, you never have to change. You're perfect as you are. But the true gospel message, Jesus looks at you and says, "You are great and you are wonderful and you are worth it in this moment. You are valuable and I'm willing to go to these depths and lengths for you as you are now." But the love story of Christ continues on because he says, "I will continue to redeem you. I will continue to save you from the mess and the mire and the muck that you're in. And I will take you to that place where you will shine.

Thinking about this, I'm interested in analyzing a particular type of romantic narrative. Frequently in romantic fiction, there's a high value placed on sacrifice. Often there's some sort of barrier between two lovers - perhaps their physical location, their careers - and one must sacrifice from that part of their lives (relocate to where their lover resides, quit their job) in order for them to be together.

I can think of a few love stories that concern sacrifice; sometimes it's a very tragic sacrifice, as in the fiction of Erich Maria Remarque; his novel Three Comrades (1936) was mostly concerned with two young lovers (Robert and Patricia) against the backdrop of a changing Germany as the Nazis rose to power. The rise of fascism is definitely not an encouraging backdrop for a romance and, indeed, Three Comrades ends tragically as Patricia dies just as the Nazis are coming into power. But it's the way Patricia dies that's so striking: suffering from a lung hemorrhage, she sees Robert depleting all of his meager funds to help prolong her life. Seeing her precarious health as a burden upon Robert and doubting that she has much hope of recovery, she hastens her demise for Robert's sake.

You can debate whether her sacrifice was the best course of action, but it is absolutely a depiction of sacrificial love, definitely on the most extreme end of that scale compared to lovers who sacrifice a job or an existing relationship.

I think I respond strongly to Three Comrades because - like my pastor - I see something in romantic fiction that points to Jesus and his love. And by "romantic," I think I can expand that to the classical definition of romance (as a Portuguese speaker, I'm amused that the Portuguese still use the traditional 'romance' when referring to fictions of all types). When a character in a war story gives up his life to save one of his buddies, what can that be but sacrificial love?

"Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends." (John 15:13) I do believe that and I'm certain the reason a story like Three Comrades - or other fiction by Remarque such as the Spark of Life (1952) - elicit such a strong emotional reaction from me because they're about people sacrificing their lives for the sake of others (in the case of the Spark of Life, it's a concentration camp prisoner who gives his life for his fellow prisoners).

As a Christian, I don't have to look too hard to find my beliefs this reflected in art, but I think it's worthwhile to draw attention to it. I'd like to think this might be true for much of what we like in fiction-- we like them because they assure us about things we believe to be true.

Saturday, January 11, 2025

2024 Review: Books

I don't read as much fiction as I once did, but I was very pleasantly surprised by Focus (1945) by Arthur Miller, which was apparently the only novel Miller wrote. The story concerns a man who has just started wearing glasses and his old acquaintences all think he looks 'Jewish' but rather than say that to his face, simply discriminate against him. That the problem is one that every character is aware of but no one can bring themselves to say aloud makes for a very tense situation. It's not only a study of prejudice but also of the power of unspoken, unchallenged beliefs.

Another good work of fiction was the Disenchanted (1950) by Budd Schulberg, which I sought out after enjoying Schulberg's What Makes Sammy Run the previous year. This one was a fictionalized version of Schulberg's relationship with F. Scott Fitzgerald and how the two men tried to write a screenplay together, only for Fitzgerald's alcoholism to scuttle the entire assignment (I watched the resulting film - Winter Carnival - and it is lousy). It's a good novel, yet the Fitzgerald character's continued debasement over hundreds of pages gets to be one-note; I realize all the scenes are inspired by events that really happened to Schulberg but on some level it might have made a superior short story.

My interest in film lead me to Alfred Hitchcock Storyboards (2024) by Tony Lee Moral, a terrific coffee table book; the author's commentary wasn't that illuminating but the samples of production art from Hitchcock's films looked terrific. And Opposable Thumbs (2023) by Matt Singer was a great look at the Roger Ebert/Gene Siskel team and how they functioned, it even inspired me to check out a few of the films that were mentioned in passing!

I suppose it's because of events transpiring among my neighbours to the south that I've become interested in understanding fascism, because in the last year I read the fictional work It Can't Happen Here (1935) by Sinclair Lewis which imagined how fascism could come to the USA; then there's the non-fiction Prequel (2023) by Rachel Maddow which explores the various fascist movements that flourished in the USA in the 1930s, as well as They Thought They Were Free (1955) by Milton Mayer, which was a study of men from a German town who had all either willingly or reluctantly conspired with the Nazis.

Others: On Writing (2000) by Stephen King inspired me in my own writing efforts; The Early Worm (1927) by Robert Benchley was another funny collection of essays; The Day the Revolution Began (2016) by N. T. Wright was a great historical look at the time of Jesus' life; The Jesus I Never Knew (1995) by Philip Yancey was a very good series of meditations on Jesus (which also referenced the above book Focus); and Muito Favorecidos (2019) by Stuart Foster, was a Portuguese version of his book Highly Favoured, a good book on the basics of faith for a primarily African audience.

2024 was also the year in which we lost science fiction author Vernor Vinge.

And that's what I enjoyed the most in 2024; I hope you yourself found some diversions - fiction or non - to enjoy in the year past and wish you good reading, watching or listening in the year ahead.

Thursday, November 28, 2024

Book Review: Death of Dignity

I recently purchased a copy of Victoria Brittain's 1998 book Death of Dignity: Angola's Civil War. The author was a reporter for the Guardian who visited Angola a few times in the 80s and 90s and I was interested to find a perspective about the country from that time period.

The book is slim, numbering only 100 pages plus a 10 page preface. The preface is what I'd hoped the rest of the book would be like - the author's personal experiences as a journalist in Angola, describing what she witnessed and what people told her. But that's not how the other 100 pages were presented; the book is primarily a history of Angola from 1975-1998. It's not really about Angolan society, or even Angolan politics; it's a book about international politics and how Angola was played like a football by various competing nations after it became independent.

The content is fine - I did pick up some interesting details here and there and particular timings of when things were announced versus when they were actually implemented that I hadn't found in other books. Otherwise, the information found in the book could be found in other titles; I was hoping the book would be something more personal and unique.

But while the content is fine, the manner in which it's relayed left me frustrated, and that's what I really want to write about. In the foreword, the author made it clear ther her book would not be "neutral" in tone but rather partisan. The author did not like the rebels and did not use any of its members' interviews in the book because "I have interviewed too many of them and seen too much of their suffering to listen to the lying justifications of those responsible."

She also promised in the foreword that "nor are there interviews with Western diplomats, the normal staple fare of Western journalists." Which is an odd hill to plant one's flag upon. She quoted Western diplomats all the time, featuring public quotes from the likes of Henry Kissinger, Chester Crocker and Margaret Antsee. She also quoted an official from the UN whom she didn't identify; either her source didn't attribute the quote or she contradicted herself? But why make the promise "I won't interview these people, but I will quote extensively from them?"

She emphasized that she did interview many Angolans and quoted them anonymously to protect them, but even there her interviewing is brief; if you added up all the interviews she conducted, it might account for 5 of the 100 pages. She quoted from the rebel's public statements very frequently, but at least she ascribed a portion of agency to them. Contrast that with her treatment of the government in quotes such as this, about the resumption of the civil war in early 1993: "The horror of how life had been reduced to a numb battle for survival in those among the MPLA leadership who never forgot it for a moment paid a heavy psychological prize as they agonised without being able to do anything." The government is written about as though they were, at best, passive.

I suppose what I really wanted was the author's personal experiences and interviews, not an opinionated guide through Angolan history. It's an angry book that is very particular to the time in which it was published (near the end of the war). But as a 1990s work of non-fiction on Angola, I found Karl Maier's book Angola: Promises and Lies - cited in Brittain's bibliography - a much better work.

Thursday, March 21, 2024

RIP: Vernor Vinge

Science fiction author Vernor Vinge passed away yesterday, aged 79.

I'm far from being an expert on contemporary science fiction literature; heck, I'm not that well versed even in the classics of science fiction. Around 2002 or 2003, I was in a group of friends who met regularly to play board games, watch science fiction television shows and chat about comic books. It was from that group that I first learned about Vernor Vinge when they strongly promoted his books to me. It's the only time the group really converged to vouch for a particular author. My friends loaned me his Hugo Award-winning novels A Fire Upon the Deep (1992) and A Deepness in the Sky (1999).

I was hooked; I learned there was a reason why my friends liked to use "Vinge" as a verb (as a replacement for "binge"). His works were dense and highly literate, yet very approachable; not just plot-driven but also very character-driven; heady science fiction concepts (particularly in ideas of relativity).

Those two novels were part of what were called Vinge's "Zones of Thought" books - set in the same universe but with barely any recurring characters. After I enjoyed reading their copies, my friends hooked me up with his short fiction anthology (the Collected Stories of Vernor Vinge) but for some reason they didn't talk up the rest of his works. I did eventually pursue his earlier novels the Peace War (1984) and Marooned in Realtime (1986). I was also pleased to pick up his new novels as they were published - Rainbows End (2006) and Children of the Sky (2011).

I'm disappointed that there won't be any additional works from such a fine author. He's certainly left behind a short but fascinating bibliography. Hopefully he'll be remembered by science fiction fans at large; he'll certainly be remembered by me. Rest in peace, Mr. Vinge.

Sunday, January 28, 2024

Radio Recap: Words at War

Words at War was an NBC dramatic program that aired from June 1943 to June of 1945. There are plenty of dramatic programs that adapted popular movies, famous plays, well-known short stories and works in the public domain. Words at War is unique in that it was concerned with recently-published works - the majority of them non-fiction! All that a work needed to appear on Words at War was that it in some way concern itself with the war itself. The series only occasionally adapted a work of fiction.

Words at War was produced by the Council on Books in Wartime and sponsored by Johnson Wax, serving for a time as a replacement series for Fibber McGee and Molly. When I first heard the Council's name mentioned on the series, I assumed they were some sort of government body; actually, they were a non-profit comprised mainly of book publishers. Among other things, they produced the "armed service editions" of books distributed to servicemen, which remain very collectable to this day.

The popularity of Words at War apparently caught NBC by surprise - it was originally supposed to run for 13 episodes, yet managed two full years in the end! A number of the authors of works heard on Words at War appeared in-person to help support the adaptations. There was also a span of about 2 months where the program was hosted and narrated by Clifton Fadiman (New Yorker, Information Please). Otherwise, the series primarily drew from the usual voices heard on NBC programming and they did a fine job. The authors may not be well-remembered today; probably most of the works are forgotten except by scholars of World War II. The best-remembered author represented on the show is almost certainly Ernie Pyle, whose books Here Is Your War and Brave Men were both adapted (the latter a few days after Pyle's tragic death).

I only discovered Words at War late in 2022. When I listened through the entire series I found that at times it could feel a little repetitive. Many of the episodes are drawn from accounts written by journalists and tend to feel a bit familiar. Early in the series there are many dramas concerned with the events that caused the war and criticized the USA's late-entry to the conflict - that gets tiresome fast. Late in the run, as it became clear that the Allies were soon going to win, there are multiple episodes anticipating post-war issues, several insisting on strong measures against Germany, others about economic issues. They have a very polemic streak to them that might have been fine for audiences at the time but I don't find they resonate today.

So how does this series resonate? Well, it helps that there are outliers, entirely unlike their fellows. "Love at First Flight" (August 14, 1943) is a funny account of a man joining the Air Force. There's a biography of George Washington Carver (February 8, 1944) that has nothing to do with the war other than to present a positive portrayal of a black man. Words at War was frequently concerned with social matters, especially anti-bigotry programs, one of the best being their December 26, 1944 series that examined historical bigotry against Jews and Catholics.

What else is good? I enjoyed "The Last Days of Sevastopol" (July 17, 1943); "One Damn Thing After Another" (November 17, 1944); "The Guys on the Ground" (December 6, 1944) and "The Bid Was Four Hearts" (February 27, 1945).

Although Words at War was a popular program it seems as though NBC was less inclined to its provocative, intellectual nature as the end of the war loomed - which is probably why the series ended before the war did. The April 17, 1945 program opened with a disclaimer from NBC:

Many of the books dramatized on this program deal with issues which have stimulated considerable controversy. It is not the purpose of Words at War or the National Broadcasting Company to take sides on these issues but merely to bring you the most representative books to come out of this great world conflict.

My guess is that the network got a lot of hate mail from the April 3rd adaptation of "Full Employment in a Free Society," which advocated strongly for a government-planned economy. A few weeks after the disclaimer they adapted "The Road to Serfdom" on May 15th which argued against a government-planned economy, probably an attempt at mollifying their critics - but since they were cancelled just a few weeks later it must not have worked.

Almost all of Words at War still exists and you can listen to the Old Time Radio Researchers Group's collection on the Internet Archive.

Below you'll find a list of all the books featured on Words at War with links to booksellers at AbeBooks who have copies for sale - just in case any of the episodes of this series should make you want to seek out the original material!

Thursday, January 11, 2024

2023: Media Retrospective

A brief look back at what media I most enjoyed in 2023

Comics

For the most part, I turned to familiar titles in 2023. Stan Sakai's Usagi Yojimbo has made a most welcome return to regular publishing and 2023 saw a mini-series team-up with the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, a Space Usagi one-shot and new ongoing stories. Larry Hama unexpectedly returned to his G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero following its cliffhanger ending at IDW; now at Image, he's picking up right where he left off. The best super hero book I read in 2023 was Al Ewing and Kasia Nie's Wasp mini-series, which had an interesting retake on the Wasp's original antagonist.

Books

There were only a few examples of fiction that really engaged with me in 2023. I finally read T. S. Stribling's short story collection Dr. Poggioli, Criminologist, a great continuation of his unusual psychologist/crime solver. I also found some enjoyment in Jo Eisinger's mystery novel The Walls Came Tumbling Down, even though it's a bit too much like Hammett's Maltese Falcon (more about Eisinger's book in this blog post). I read a bit of Oscar Wilde's fairy tale collections and particularly enjoyed the Happy Prince and Other Stories, they somehow manage to be very satirical yet sentimental. I read Nicholas Blake's the Smiler with the Knife because I was curious as to why Orson Welles had wanted to make a film of it; it's a lot like one of John Buchan's spy novels such as the Power-House, a good read. I read Algernon Blackwood's short story collection Shocks, which might be the last of his anthologies I hadn't read; most of the stories were in some manner a ghost story and began to feel a little familiar but other tales had strong twists on the format. And I read Endo Shusaku's historical novel the Samurai, largely because it had been recommended in Philip Yancey's Sole Survivor.

But the best fiction I read in 2023 was by Budd Schulberg. Reading about Jack Kirby had revealed to me that Kirby was a big fan of Schulberg's novel What Makes Sammy Run? so I sought it out to learn why; it's a compelling book, not only an examination of the dark side of Hollywood but of American values as well. I also read Schulberg's short story anthology, Some Faces in the Crowd; more about that when I write about films.

One of the best non-fiction works I read was American Midnight, the latest bit of journalism by Adam Hochschild, this time focusing on how World War I undid many of the socialist politicians of the time. And my wife led me to two great works about how to express belief through one's art - Walking on Water by Madeleine L'Engle and Art + Faith by Makoto Fujimura.

The rest of the significant books I read in 2023 were Christian books, including the Return of the Prodigal Son by Henri Nouwen, Where Is God When It Hurts? by Philip Yancey and N. T. Wright's books Simply Jesus, Reflecting the Glory and Following Jesus.

Cinema

I went to the cinema more frequently in 2023 than most years, due almost entirely to my wife (of the 7 films I saw in cinemas, the only one I didn't see with her is the one I saw before we started dating). I was pleased to find that Avatar: The Way of Water was a pretty good film (and I blogged about it in this post). Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania was okay, though the Wasp didn't do much to earn her byline (it was really more about Ant-Man and his daughter). Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 was an excellent send-off to that film series. I found Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny wasn't up to the standards of the earlier films but was all right (I shared more thoughts in this post). Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One was easily the best action movie I saw in 2023, particularly with a very fun car chase and a great set piece aboard a falling train. Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer was an excellent biographical film, the sort of story Ridley Scott's Napoleon aspired to be; I don't hesitate to call Nolan's film a triumph but Scott's film had some moments too, mostly due to oddly-chosen dialogue.

Other Films

At this point I'm so well-versed in old films that I seldom discover anything from the '30s-50s that really stands out, yet A Face in the Crowd (based on one of Schulberg's stories from Some Faces in the Crowd) was a very strong work and surprisingly relevant to today's USA (also very much like Schulberg's What Makes Sammy Run?). I enjoyed the documentary films Louis Armstrong's Black and Blues and Sidney. I was surprised to find I enjoyed the 1960s musical How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying and very pleasantly surprised to discover the satirical film Johnny Dangerously, which fit precisely into my sense of humour. The Disney film Elemental was a fun one to watch with my wife and she, in turn, got me to watch Blast from the Past, which I had known for decades was supposed to be very funny - it was!

Television

I might have watched more television programming in 2023 than any other year in the last decade. Not all of the programs were memorable, but my wife got me watching the comedy series Arrested Development (which I like a lot) and the action program Alias (which I'll post about when I finish the series). 2023 was the year Ted Lasso ended, not entirely on its best footing but definitely as a strong program (I shared my closing thoughts on the series in this post). That also led me to the documentary series Welcome to Wrexham which has been pretty enjoyable. I also enjoyed the mini-series the 1619 Project, based on the book, but the series seems to have attracted a lot of online hate (just as the book did). Beyond that, I've been slowly revisiting the Dick Van Dyke Show, which I hadn't seen since my early teenage years and I appreciate being in a place now where I understand all of the jokes.

And that was my 2023. How was yours?